Strength is often praised as if it has no cost. Women who keep going, hold everything together, and push through pain are frequently described as resilient, dependable, and unshakable. But psychology suggests that strength can become complicated when it also requires emotional suppression. Research on emotion regulation has found that suppression may reduce outward expression, but it often does not reduce the internal emotional experience itself. Instead, it can carry social and psychological costs, including less authentic connection and greater strain on the person doing the suppressing (Gross, 2002). In other words, looking composed is not the same as being unburdened.  

That distinction matters because many women are not simply being “strong”; they are surviving. They are adapting to environments, relationships, workplaces, and histories that have taught them to stay calm, stay useful, stay dependable, and stay quiet. Over time, silence can begin to look like maturity, when in reality it may be a survival pattern. Trauma research has long noted that overwhelming experiences can shape emotional expression, including patterns such as emotional numbing or constriction, where a person’s inner life becomes harder to feel or communicate openly (Litz, 2002). What gets labeled as strength can sometimes be the residue of what once felt necessary to endure.

Emotional labor deepens this burden. Emotional labor is not only what people do in formal workplaces; it also shows up in homes, friendships, caregiving roles, ministry, community leadership, and service professions. It is the quiet effort of managing one’s own feelings while also carrying, buffering, soothing, or organizing the emotions of others. When that labor becomes chronic, the person performing it can become highly functional on the outside while becoming more depleted on the inside. Research across helping professions consistently links chronic emotional stress and burnout with worse mental health outcomes, including depression and reduced well-being (Chen et al., 2021). The lesson is broader than any one profession: when emotional demand is constant, “holding it together” can stop being a strength and start becoming a hidden drain.

For Black women, this conversation often has another layer. A growing body of research has examined the Strong Black Woman or Superwoman schema—a social and cultural expectation that Black women remain emotionally strong, self-reliant, nurturing, and able to endure hardship without visible vulnerability. Studies have linked stronger endorsement of this schema with greater psychological distress, including anxiety and depressive symptoms, especially when self-silencing and emotional suppression are part of the pattern (Abrams et al., 2018; Dogan et al., 2020). Additional research has shown that this schema is also associated with lower emotional support-seeking and a tendency to help others at one’s own expense (Woods-Giscombé et al., 2016; Erving et al., 2023). That means the very trait society may applaud—being the one who can carry everything—can also become the mechanism that keeps a woman from receiving what she needs.  

This is where many women begin to confuse survival with strength. Survival says, “Keep moving, even if you cannot feel yourself.” Suppression says, “Do not say it, because saying it may cost too much.” Emotional labor says, “Take care of everyone else first.” But real strength is more honest than that. Real strength can tell the truth about exhaustion. Real strength can acknowledge grief, anger, overwhelm, disappointment, and the weight of carrying too much for too long. Research on self-silencing among Black women specifically suggests that silencing the self can help explain the link between “strength” norms and depressive symptoms (Abrams et al., 2018). Silence may preserve appearance, but it can also deepen suffering.  

So when being strong becomes a way of staying silent, it is worth asking a different set of questions. What have you been calling strength that is actually suppression? What emotional labor have you normalized because you are used to being the one who can handle it? What part of your silence was once protective—but is no longer serving your healing? These are not signs of weakness. They are signs that you are ready to move from automatic survival into conscious reflection.  

That is why this moment calls for more than admiration for endurance. It calls for reflection, reset, and honesty. You do not have to keep calling survival strength alone. You can honor what it took to make it through and still admit that it cost you something. You can tell the truth about what has been heavy. You can choose support, rest, boundaries, and voice. And you can begin again—not from denial, but from clarity. That is not weakness. That is a wiser kind of strength.  

Alesha Brown, CEO, Fruition Publishing Concierge Services®

Editor-in-Chief, Published! Magazine®

Award-Winning Entrepreneur|Publisher|Film Producer

This article is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for mental health care. If emotional distress, burnout, depression, or trauma-related symptoms are significantly affecting daily functioning, support from a licensed professional is appropriate and important.

References

Abrams, J. A., Maxwell, M. L., Pope, M., & Belgrave, F. Z. (2018). Underneath the mask of the strong Black woman schema: Disentangling influences of strength and self-silencing on depressive symptoms among U.S. Black women. Sex Roles, 79(9–10), 517–526.

Chen, C., Meier, S. T., & others. (2021). Burnout and depression in nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 124, 104099.

Dogan, J., Bannon, W. M., Jr., & Mowatt, R. A. (2020). Superwoman schema: A context for understanding psychological distress among middle-class African American women who perceive racial microaggressions. Ethnicity & Health, 25(7), 921–939.

Erving, C. L., Thomas, C. S., & Frazier, C. (2023). Superwoman schema and self-rated health in Black women. Social Science & Medicine – Mental Health, 3, 100198.

Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281–291.

Litz, B. T. (2002). Emotional numbing in posttraumatic stress disorder: Current and future research directions. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(2), 198–204.

Woods-Giscombé, C. L., Allen, A. M., Black, A. R., Steed, T. C., Li, Y., & Lackey, C. (2016). Superwoman schema, stigma, spirituality, and culturally sensitive providers: Factors influencing mental health service use among African American women. Journal of Best Practices in Health Professions Diversity, 9(1), 1124–1144.