When “Keeping the Peace” Is Really Self-Erasure

Many women are praised for being peaceful when what they are actually doing is disappearing. They learn how to soften their tone, minimize their needs, swallow their reactions, and make themselves emotionally smaller so everything around them can stay stable. From the outside, that can look like maturity. Psychologically, it can be something else entirely: self-erasure.
Research on self-silencing has long shown that suppressing one’s own needs and truth to preserve connection can be linked to depression and emotional distress in women (Jack & Dill, 1992). More recent work continues to connect people-pleasing and chronic self-suppression with poorer mental health, not greater wellness (Kuang et al., 2025).
What makes this pattern especially deceptive is that self-erasure is often rewarded. A woman who absorbs tension without complaint may be called wise. A woman who keeps everyone comfortable may be called strong. But emotional suppression is not free. A recent quantitative review found that suppression can intensify physiological stress responses, even when it reduces outward emotional expression in the moment (Tyra et al., 2024). In other words, what looks calm on the outside may still be costly in the body.
One reason women stay in this pattern is that self-erasure can feel protective. If speaking up has historically led to criticism, rejection, or escalation, disappearing can seem safer than honesty. Recent research on adult attachment and mental health found that attachment style is associated with mental health states, with social support playing an important mediating role (Yang et al., 2024). When connection feels uncertain, many women learn to protect relationships by shrinking themselves inside them rather than risking conflict.
That is part of why fawning, people-pleasing, and chronic accommodation are receiving more attention in current psychology. These patterns are not simply kindness. Recent psychometric research on people-pleasing found that it includes cognitive, behavioral, and emotional dimensions and is meaningfully associated with mental health concerns (Kuang et al., 2025). For many women, what gets called “keeping the peace” is actually chronic self-editing for approval, safety, or survival.
For Black women, this dynamic can carry additional pressure. Current scholarship on the Strong Black Woman schema continues to describe links between chronic emotional restraint, over-obligation, self-sacrifice, and poorer mental health outcomes (Jones et al., 2025). In practice, this means some Black women are not only expected to keep the peace, but to do so while appearing endlessly strong, capable, and unaffected. That makes self-erasure easier to glorify and harder to identify.
Boundary research also helps explain why this costs so much over time. A 2024 study on boundary violations and flourishing found that repeated boundary disruption was associated with poorer well-being, while psychological detachment served a protective role (Mascarenhas et al., 2024). Although that study focused on work-related boundaries, the broader lesson still applies: when there is no protected edge between you and what drains you, your well-being suffers.

This is one reason contemporary psychology increasingly emphasizes psychological flexibility rather than emotional overcontrol. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy research focuses on acting in line with values, tolerating discomfort, and reducing avoidance-based living (Hayes et al., 2006). From that perspective, health is not found in being endlessly absorbent, endlessly agreeable, or endlessly calm. Sometimes health looks like telling the truth, allowing tension, and refusing to disappear inside relationships or systems that only function when you do.
So the real question is not whether everyone stayed comfortable. The deeper question is whether you stayed present. Not whether there was less tension, but what that calm required from you. Not whether you kept the peace, but whether you had to abandon yourself to do it.
Reminder
They only called it peace because you were the one doing all the disappearing. And if your calm required your self-erasure, your nervous system may have survived it—but your spirit still knows the difference.
Alesha Brown, CEO, Fruition Publishing Concierge Services®
Editor-in-Chief, Published! Magazine®
Award-Winning Entrepreneur|Publisher|Film Producer
References
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
Jack, D. C., & Dill, D. (1992). The Silencing the Self Scale: Schemas of intimacy associated with depression in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00242.x
Jones, M. K., Harrington, K. M., Burrell, L., et al. (2025). The Strong Black Woman schema and mental health. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. Advance online publication.
Kuang, X., Li, H., Luo, W., Zhu, J., & Ren, F. (2025). The mental health implications of people-pleasing: Psychometric properties and latent profiles of the Chinese People-Pleasing Questionnaire. Psych Journal, 14(4), 500–512. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.70016
Mascarenhas, M., Carvalho, V. S., Moretto, C. F., & Chambel, M. J. (2024). Boundary violations and university teachers’ well-being during mandatory telework: Recovery’s role and gender differences. BMC Public Health, 24, Article 747. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18178-6
Tyra, A. T., Grijalva, C. M., Contreras-Osorio, F., & Sroga, J. M. (2024). Emotion suppression and acute physiological responses to stress in healthy populations: A quantitative review of experimental and correlational investigations. Health Psychology Review, 18(3), 396–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2023.2251559
Yang, Y., Chen, K., Liang, K., Du, W., Guo, J., & Du, L. (2024). Association between adult attachment and mental health states among health care workers: The mediating role of social support. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1330581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1330581
