There is a version of “healed” that gets praised because she appears impossible to hurt.

She does not need anybody.

She does not explain herself.

She keeps everyone at a safe emotional distance.

Nothing rattles her—or at least nobody gets to see when it does.

From the outside, she may look powerful. But being difficult to reach is not automatically evidence that you have healed.

Sometimes it means the protection worked so well that it never learned when to stand down.

Healing Should Give You More Choices, Not Fewer

One of the more important shifts in contemporary psychology is away from labeling individual emotion-regulation strategies as simply “good” or “bad.” Researchers are increasingly interested in regulatory flexibility: whether a person can recognize what a situation requires and adjust accordingly.

In real-world studies, greater sensitivity to context and access to a wider repertoire of emotion-regulation strategies have been associated with lower momentary distress (Chen et al., 2024). More recent research similarly found that regulatory flexibility was associated with psychological health, although the relationship with well-being becomes more nuanced at very high levels (Werner et al., 2026). That gives us a better definition of healing.

Healing is not, “I never let anybody close again.”

It is, “I know when closeness is safe and when distance is necessary.”

Not, “I stopped feeling.”

But, “I can feel without allowing every emotion to control my behavior.”

Not, “Nobody can hurt me.”

But, “Someone hurting me no longer requires me to become someone I do not recognize.”

Your Armor May Have Been Intelligent

This matters particularly when talking about Black women because emotional protection does not develop in a social vacuum. A 2026 study introduced psychological armoring as a culturally relevant way of examining psychological inflexibility among Black women experiencing gendered racism. In a community sample of 187 Black American women, psychological armoring partially explained the relationship between gendered racism and trauma symptoms from discrimination (Stori et al., 2026). The study also found that women who felt they gave more social support than they received reported lower satisfaction with their support systems.

That deserves careful interpretation. Armor can be adaptive. If you have repeatedly been stereotyped, underestimated, betrayed, punished for vulnerability, expected to carry other people, or placed in environments where emotional exposure had consequences, becoming guarded may have made sense.

So the goal is not to shame the armor. The goal is to notice when yesterday’s protection becomes today’s limitation.

A locked door is useful when danger is outside. It becomes a prison when you no longer remember how to open it.

Strength Is Not Emotional Rigidity

Research on resilience increasingly emphasizes flexible adaptation rather than one fixed personality or coping style. Bonanno et al. (2024) argue that resilient responses depend partly on accurately reading changing circumstances and adjusting accordingly.

That means the woman who cries and then handles the situation may be emotionally stronger than the woman who refuses to feel anything.

The woman who asks for help may be functioning from greater security than the woman determined to prove she never needs it.

The leader who can say, “That hurt me,” without surrendering her authority has not become weaker. She has developed range. And range matters because human beings do not regulate emotions entirely alone.

A growing area of affective science examines interpersonal emotion regulation—the ways supportive relationships help us process and regulate emotional experiences (Nozaki & Gross, 2025). Being reachable by safe people is not a defect in your healing. It can be part of it.

Conduct an Armor Audit

Instead of asking, “Am I strong enough?” ask:

  • Can I distinguish an unsafe person from a safe person who simply makes me feel vulnerable?
  • Can I receive support without immediately feeling indebted, exposed, or weak?
  • Can I express disappointment without either exploding or completely shutting down?
  • Can I lower my guard somewhere—or is everyone treated as a potential threat?

If your answer to some of those questions makes you uncomfortable, that does not erase your progress. It may reveal where the next layer of healing lives.

Because boundaries and walls are not the same thing. A boundary has a gate. You decide who enters, under what conditions, and when access ends. A wall simply keeps everyone out.

  • You can be discerning and tender.
  • Powerful and emotionally available.
  • Wise and still capable of trust.
  • You can protect yourself without building your entire identity around protection.

Healing should make you safer in your softness—not permanently unavailable to it.

Alesha Brown, CEO, Fruition Publishing Concierge Services®

Editor-in-Chief, Published! Magazine®

Award-Winning Entrepreneur|Publisher|Speaker

References

Bonanno, G. A., Chen, S., Bagrodia, R., & Galatzer-Levy, I. R. (2024). Resilience and disaster: Flexible adaptation in the face of uncertain threat. Annual Review of Psychology, 75, 573–599. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-011123-024224

Chen, M. S., Bi, K., Han, X., Sun, P., & Bonanno, G. A. (2024). Emotion regulation flexibility and momentary affect in two cultures. Nature Mental Health, 2, 450–459. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-024-00215-3

Nozaki, Y., & Gross, J. J. (2025). Bridging supportive communication and interpersonal emotion regulation: An integrative review. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 42(8), 2231–2262. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075251335816

Stori, S. A., Cattaneo, L. B., Ramseur, K., II, & Adams, L. M. (2026). Centering malleable factors in Black women’s mental health: How psychological armoring and social support role dynamics connect to trauma symptoms from gendered racism. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 96(4), 442–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000853

Werner, K. M., Preece, D. A., Berkman, E. T., & Gross, J. J. (2026). Regulatory flexibility and psychological health—Is more always better? Journal of Affective Disorders, 398, 120893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.120893